Home page - digilibLT
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale - Amedeo Avogadro Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Vercelli Regione Piemonte
  • Home
  • The project
  • News
  • Late antiquity on the web
  • Help
  • Contacts and feedback
  • Reserved area
  • DH Day 2021
English language Italian language
Large font size Default font size Small font size
Search

Find



  • Searchable works
  • Advanced search
  • Search the bibliography

Browse and download
  • Works
  • Authors
  • Bibliography
By date
  • II
  • III
  • IV
  • V
  • VI
  • VII
  • VIII
  • Uncertain date
  • All the works
By name
    • A
    • B
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • H
    • I
    • L
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • P
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • T
    • V
  • All the works
Other resources
  • Modern studies on late antiquity
  • Canon of late-antique authors
  • Fonts and software to download
  • Download texts

Additional proponent

External link to the website of the Università degli studi di Torino

Epistula ad Optatianum Porfyrium
Constantinus (Flavius Valerius Constantinus) (Imperator Constantinus Magnus)
Author Details

Imp. 306-337
Catalogue entry
ID: DLT000105
Textual type: Epistolography
Digital edition by the digilibLT group - Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale

Available downloads

Download the text in TXT Download the text in TEI Download the text in PDF Download the text in E-PUB Download the catalogue entry


Reference edition:

 

Publilii Optatiani Porfyrii, Carmina, I: textus; adiectio indice uerborum; recensuit Iohannes Polara, Torino 1973, 4-6, (Corpus scriptorum Latinorum Paravianum).

 

A majority of manuscripts transmitting the poetic works of Publilius Optatianus Porfirius include a pair of letters that present themselves, respectively, as an epistle from Constantine the Great to the poet, and from Porfirius to the emperor.  Most scholars tend to accept their authenticity, as well as their usefulness as sources for reconstructing Porfirius’ life and poetic activity; nevertheless, doubts have been raised.  These can be traced as early as Kaspar Barth in the mid-17th c., and appear most recently in the latest commentary (1973), which views the epistles as a scholarly exercise, and in the work of Smolak (1989). Against the authenticity of Constantine’s letter - which Kluge (1924) maintains was personally written by the emperor himself, rather than by his chancellery - one may note an epistle from Theodosius to Ausonius claiming to be the first time that an emperor had written personally and directly to a poet.  More relevant, perhaps, are a series of chronological contradictions that one finds when comparing the two letters: that of Constantine speaks of an initial dispatch of carmina from the poet, while that of Porfirius refers to carmina which had already been sent on prior occasions.  This would appear to suggest that the emperor’s letter preceded the poet’s, yet Porfirius’s epistle presents itself as the first contact between the two men, even as the emperor’s appears to show greater familiarity from the start.

The style of Constantine’s letter is quite different than what one finds being produced by the imperial chancellery in late antiquity, and a few of its more obvious imprecisions would be strange in a text written by the court at the start of the 4th c.: it speaks of the cothurni (buskins) used for comedy, frequently repeats the same words and conjunctions, and also includes certain grammatical errors that some editors have tried to remedy in various ways.  The text comprises a series of loci communes (literary tropes): no one can hope to compete with Homer and Vergil, but all can compose poetry anyhow; theatrical works, elegies, and lyrics continue to be written; in some periods the state values poets less, but they receive their proper due under a good emperor; and poetry is more difficult than prose because it needs to respect meter, a point of view from which Porfirius is truly deserving of merit, since he has added to the task’s usual difficulties the pleasure of a new and complicated technique, viz. the very difficult composition of versus intexti. [G. Polara; tr. C. L. Caterine].


Preliminary steps: Nadia Rosso
Text fitting: Beatrice Strona
TEI code: Nadia Rosso
Digital edition by the digilibLT group - Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale
Back to list
Bibliography
  1. Kluge, E. Studien zu Publilius Optatianus Porfyrius
  2. La Penna, A. Poche note a Optaziano Porfirio
  3. Marcone, A. Costantino il Grande
  4. Pipitone, G. Dalla figura all'interpretazione: scoli a Optaziano Porfirio
  5. Polara, G. Carmi di Publilio Optaziano Porfirio
  6. Polara, I. Publilii Optatiani Porfyrii Carmina
  7. Smolak, K. Publilius Optatianus Porfyrius

Creative Commons License This page licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non commercial - ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License
Release 2.22 - Made by Step srl